🐂 Not all bull runs are created equal. November’s AI picks include 5 stocks up +20% eachUnlock Stocks

Bank of America must face overdraft fee refund lawsuit

Published 04/04/2024, 11:19 AM
Updated 04/04/2024, 11:31 AM
© Reuters. File photo: A signage is seen at the Bank of America Tower in Manhattan, New York City, New York, U.S., November 2, 2022. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File photo
BAC
-

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - Bank of America must face a lawsuit claiming it reneged on a promise to refund overdraft fees to customers facing financial hardship because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers (NYSE:ROG) ruled on Wednesday that customers plausibly alleged that the bank misled them on its website and mobile app by continuing to promise relief from overdraft and insufficient fund fees, after it had quietly ended its "Client Assistance Program" on Aug. 31, 2020.

The second-largest U.S. bank began the program five months earlier to address the pandemic's impact on its 66 million individual and small business customers. Many banks offered their customers comparable relief.

According to the complaint, Bank of America misled customers into believing it was better to incur $35 overdraft fees than borrow from family members or obtain loans, because the fees would be refunded under the program.

Rogers, based in Oakland, California, concluded that the plaintiffs "sufficiently pleaded that defendant advertised a program when none existed."

She also called it "plausibly deceptive" for Bank of America not to formally disclose it had ended the program, even as it promised to offer refunds on a "case-by-case" basis.

In seeking a dismissal, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank said reasonable customers would not have viewed a formal announcement as material, and that it never promised refunds for months or years as pandemic conditions eased.

Bank of America declined on Thursday to comment on the decision. Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In January, the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau proposed curbing overdraft fees at large banks, reducing the typical $35 fee to as little as $3 and potentially saving consumers $3.5 billion a year.

The Bank of America case had been led by California truck driver Anthony Ramirez, California manufacturing worker Mynor Aldana and New Jersey retired widow Janet Hobson.

© Reuters. File photo: A signage is seen at the Bank of America Tower in Manhattan, New York City, New York, U.S., November 2, 2022. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File photo

Each said the bank refused to refund hundreds of dollars of overdraft and insufficient funds fees imposed in 2020, 2021 or 2022.

The case is Ramirez et al v. Bank of America NA, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-00859.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.