⭐ Start off 2025 with a powerful boost to your portfolio: January’s freshest AI-picked stocksUnlock stocks

Phoenix voters reject pension overhaul backed by billionaire

Published 11/05/2014, 08:38 AM
Updated 11/05/2014, 08:40 AM
Phoenix voters reject pension overhaul backed by billionaire

(Reuters) - Voters in Phoenix have rejected a proposal, funded in part by a hedge fund billionaire, to convert the pension system for city workers to a 401k-style retirement plan favored by most U.S. private employers.

In a big victory for city labor unions, voters rejected Prop. 487 by a margin of 56.5 percent to 43.5 percent, according to results posted online by the Maricopa County Recorder/Elections Office.

The measure proposed to end the city's traditional defined-benefit pension plan for new workers, shifting them to a plan dominant in the private sector, with employees pay a far greater share of the cost. Existing workers could have kept their current pensions.

The initiative was one of this year's biggest test cases pushed by pension-reform advocates, including Texas billionaire and former Enron executive John Arnold, who have argued that traditional pension plans are an increasingly unaffordable burden for cash-strapped state and local governments.

The pro-reform camp drew in more than $1.4 million in contributions, with more than $1 million coming from Arnold, according to the Arizona Republic newspaper.

Arnold, a former trader at Enron, the defunct energy company, went on to make an estimated $3 billion running Centaurus, a Houston-based natural gas-trading hedge fund.

Pension costs and debt were significant factors in the bankruptcies of Detroit, and of Stockton and San Bernardino in California, where bankruptcy judges have said public pensions are no longer sacrosanct. Efforts to reform pensions are ongoing in California and Illinois.

Fierce fights, with successes and failures on both sides and bankrolled with tens of millions of dollars, have been waged in Rhode Island and Kentucky, where laws altering retirement benefits for public workers were passed in 2011 and 2013,

In California, an effort for a statewide pension reform initiative faltered this year. Arnold bankrolled reform efforts in all three states.

A ballot initiative to change the public pension system was overwhelmingly rejected by voters in Cincinnati, Ohio, last year, despite almost $500,000 in contributions, mostly from outside non-profit groups that did not disclose their funding sources. An effort in Tucson, Arizona, was knocked off the ballot after a lawsuit.

Phoenix's pension fund for so-called non-safety employees is 64.2 percent funded, according to Rick Naimark, the deputy city manager. It faces a $1.09 billion shortfall over 20 years to pay pensions. Retirement plans for police and firefighters remain untouched.

A report from the city council had estimated that take-home pensions for new hires would have been cut roughly in half had Prop. 487 passed.

(Additional reporting by Tim Reid; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.