Lawmakers split along party lines on Justice Department's pot probes

Published 06/24/2020, 03:56 PM
Updated 06/24/2020, 08:40 PM
© Reuters. Attorney General Barr attends roundtable discussion at the White House in Washington

By Diane Bartz

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Attorney General William Barr ordered unneeded probes into the cannabis industry because of his opposition to pot, a Justice Department attorney testified Wednesday in a stormy congressional hearing on allegations of politically-motivated overreach by Barr.

John Elias, a career Justice Department antitrust attorney who served as the division's chief of staff, testified under oath that since March 2019 the Barr Justice Department investigated 10 mergers in the cannabis industry, even though the industry is not concentrated.

Democrats and Republicans jousted over the propriety of those probes.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat, said it was "unacceptable that he (Barr) would order the Antitrust Division to initiate pretextual investigations into industries that he and the president do not like."

Republican Representative Louie Gohmert dismissed Elias' concerns as a "side show," adding, "It's a shame we don't have a serious hearing."

Elias criticized the marijuana industry investigations as "very burdensome."

In one proposed marijuana merger, the antitrust staff calculated post-merger market share at 0.35 percent, far below the double-digits, which normally causes antitrust concern, Elias said in written testimony.

At one point, staff discontent was so marked that Makan Delrahim, who heads the division, addressed the issue at a staff meeting in September 2019, according to Elias, who quoted him as saying the investigations were being done because "the fifth floor," where Barr's office is, does not like the industry.

Barr said in his confirmation hearing in early 2019 that he disagreed with a decision by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions to reverse a policy easing federal enforcement of marijuana laws but would "not go after companies" that had relied on Obama-era guidance.

Representative Doug Collins, a Republican, pointed out that the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility had found the cannabis probes to be appropriate, and said that Elias had sought to work for the committee Democrats.

"The credibility of this is going down quickly here," he said.

© Reuters. Attorney General Barr attends roundtable discussion at the White House in Washington

Elias also said that a probe of four automakers began the day after Trump tweeted on Aug. 21 that he was angered that the companies negotiated with California about air quality emissions standards. The investigation deterred other automakers from joining the California agreements, according to industry officials.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.