U.S. senators say OPM data breach appears state-sponsored

Published 06/10/2015, 12:38 PM
© Reuters. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management building in Washington

By Patricia Zengerle

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Members of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee said on Wednesday that a massive theft of data last week from U.S. government computers appears to have been state-sponsored, although they stopped short of pointing the finger at China.

The breach of Office of Personnel Management (OPM) computers was disclosed on Thursday by the Obama administration, which said records of up to 4 million current and former federal employees may have been compromised.

Asked by reporters on a conference call if the cyber attack appeared to be state-sponsored, rather than a criminal event, Senator Angus King said, "It appears to be so, but I'm qualifying that because I don't have the data at this time."

King, a Maine independent who caucuses with Senate Democrats, said, "I'm going to let the administration be the people that give you the confirmation on that." He added that the intelligence panel had a classified briefing on the OPM hack on Tuesday.

Democratic Senator Mark Warner, also a committee member, said he would "concur with" King.

Accusations by U.S. government sources of a Chinese role in the cyber attack, including possible state sponsorship, could further strain ties between Washington and Beijing. Tensions are already heightened over Chinese assertiveness in pursuit of territorial claims in the South China Sea.

King and Warner held the call to push lawmakers to grant OPM's request for $32 million in additional funds, much of it for information technology upgrades.

"We need to very much strengthen our cybersecurity protections," Warner said. "This is an attack on America."

The senators spoke as Democrats and Republicans argued over how to deal with mandatory spending limits as they formulate this year's spending and tax legislation.

Republicans want to use special war funding to exempt the Department of Defense from many of the mandatory "sequestration" budget caps. Democrats argue that cybersecurity and other programs should also be spared.

King and Warner said they disagreed with a decision by the Senate's Republican leaders to include a cybersecurity bill already passed by the House as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, a defense policy bill that Obama has threatened to veto.

"The bill ought to come up on its own and attaching it to the defense authorization is a mistake," King said.

© Reuters. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management building in Washington

Corporations have been clamoring for Congress to address cybersecurity after high-profile attacks on companies, as well as attacks on government systems.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.