Some Republicans who opposed defense bill may back veto override

Published 10/26/2015, 07:41 PM
Updated 10/26/2015, 07:50 PM
© Reuters. Rep. Jim Jordan questions Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as she testifies before the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Capitol Hill in Washington

By Patricia Zengerle

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Some congressional Republicans who voted against a sweeping defense policy bill would consider voting to override President Barack Obama's veto of the measure, three members of the Freedom Caucus, one of the party's most conservative groups, told Reuters on Monday.

Representatives Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan and Mick Mulvaney, founders of the influential group, told Reuters in an interview that Republicans are in an all-out push to muster the two-thirds majorities in both the House of Representatives and Senate to override the veto.

Meadows, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, voted for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). He said he was encouraging caucus members who did not to back an override, citing the wide variety of security threats now facing the United States.

Obama, a Democrat, vetoed the sweeping $612 billion NDAA last week, returning it to the Republican-controlled Congress because of the way it uses money meant for war spending to avoid automatic budget cuts to military programs.

Democrats insist Republicans will not get the 290 votes needed for an override in the House. Outside analysts say it will be difficult.

Under congressional rules, the House will hold its override vote first, on Nov. 5. The Senate will not have a vote if the House sustains the veto.

The NDAA passed the House by 270-156 on Oct. 1. Ten Republicans, including seven Freedom Caucus members, joined 146 Democrats in voting no.

Mulvaney was among them. He said he voted no because of the use of the special war money.

"I don't like the use of the Overseas Contingency Operations budget to get around the budget caps," he said. "... We're lying to people about how we spend their money."

Mulvaney said he was undecided, but would consider backing an override if Paul Ryan, who is expected to be elected as House speaker this week, could promise that the use of the OCO funds to avoid the budget caps would not continue after the fiscal 2016 NDAA.

Mulvaney said he would back an override "If Paul (Ryan) can satisfy me... that this is not going to be a blank check for the military, this is not going to be a tool that we use all the time, this is not going to be a go-around."

© Reuters. Rep. Jim Jordan questions Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as she testifies before the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Capitol Hill in Washington

The hard-right Freedom Caucus recently played a major role in ousting House Speaker John Boehner.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.