Senators challenge Trump plan to privatize air traffic control

Published 06/07/2017, 01:06 PM
Updated 06/07/2017, 01:10 PM
© Reuters. Shuster takes a gentle ribbing from Cruz and others after Shuster asked U.S. President Donald Trump to sign autographs after Trump signed principles of proposed reforms to the U.S. air traffic control system during an event at the White House in Washington
LUV
-
UAL
-
AAL
-

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States' top transportation official on Wednesday promoted the Trump administration's proposed privatization of the air traffic control system in the face of criticism from Democratic lawmakers and some Republicans.

"Our air traffic organization must be more nimble," U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao told the Senate Commerce Committee. "A bulky federal government procurement apparatus does not move fast enough to keep pace with new technologies and new demands."

President Donald Trump on Monday unveiled the plan to modernize air traffic control and lower flying costs. Under the proposal, air traffic control would be spun off from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and put under the aegis of a nonprofit entity.

Critics say the plan would hand control of a key asset to special interests and big airlines.

Senator Roger Wicker, a Mississippi Republican, said on Wednesday that small airports in his state oppose the plan. He said that after air traffic privatization in the United Kingdom airline passenger fees rose 30 percent. "This is a tough sell," Wicker said.

Senator Jerry Moran, a Kansas Republican, said he remains "skeptical" of the idea of removing Congress from air traffic control oversight and handing it to a 13-member board.

The administration says it would not charge the private entity for the government's air traffic control assets and would bar Congress from reviewing fees charged by the board.

Senator Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat, opposes the proposal. "Why give away billions of dollars in government assets to an entity that will be governed in large part by the airlines?" he asked.

Nelson argued "a fundamental breakup of the FAA cannot advance when there are such strong divisions among aviation stakeholders and in Congress. It just won't happen."

Chao denied that the major airlines would control the board and said they would have just two seats on the board.

She also pledged to address rural concerns. One big issue is whether general aviation could face higher costs and access to airspace if a private board takes over.

Executives from United Airlines (N:UAL), Hawaiian Airlines Inc [HAII.UL], American Airlines Inc (O:AAL) and Southwest Airlines Co (N:LUV), all represented by the Airlines for America lobbying group, praised the Trump plan on Monday.

The FAA spends nearly $10 billion a year on air traffic control funded largely through passenger user fees, and has spent more than $7.5 billion on next-generation air traffic control reforms in recent years.

© Reuters. Shuster takes a gentle ribbing from Cruz and others after Shuster asked U.S. President Donald Trump to sign autographs after Trump signed principles of proposed reforms to the U.S. air traffic control system during an event at the White House in Washington

It is unclear whether privatization would speed the rollout of new systems such as satellite-based aircraft tracking that replaces ground radar dating back to World War Two.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.