🔺 What to do when markets are at an all-time high? Find smart bargains, like these.See Undervalued Stocks

SEC not required to make firms disclose political contributions: judge

Published 01/04/2016, 03:33 PM
Updated 01/04/2016, 03:40 PM
© Reuters. To match Special Report SEC/INVESTIGATIONS
AET
-

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit seeking to force the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to adopt a rule requiring publicly traded companies to disclose political contributions.

U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer in Washington, D.C. found no showing by the plaintiff Stephen Silberstein that the SEC had a "clear legal duty" to begin a rulemaking proceeding, and that its failure was arbitrary and capricious.

She also said she lacked jurisdiction to consider whether the SEC engaged in "unreasonable delay" by ignoring Silberstein's rulemaking petition. Collyer said such a claim might be raised before a federal appeals court.

The lawsuit was filed last May by the nonprofit Campaign for Accountability on behalf of Silberstein, an Aetna Inc (N:AET) shareholder who had unsuccessfully sued the insurer in New York to force it to reveal its political donations.

Silberstein said improved disclosure is necessary in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision in 2010, which allowed unlimited independent spending by corporations and labor unions in federal elections.

He said shareholders deserve the right to assess whether corporate contributions are in companies' best interests.

Daniel Stevens, a spokesman for the Campaign for Accountability, said the group is disappointed in Tuesday's decision and may file a complaint with the appeals court.

SEC spokesman Kevin Callahan had no immediate comment.

The regulator had argued that it had discretion, but no obligation, to begin a rulemaking proceeding.

The Citizens United decision inspired a wave of new campaign spending, including from politically-focused nonprofits that need not disclose the identities of their donors.

The Campaign for Accountability has estimated that the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign may cost at least $5 billion, roughly double the $2.6 billion that the nonprofit Center for Responsive Politics has estimated was spent on the 2012 campaign.

© Reuters. To match Special Report SEC/INVESTIGATIONS

The case is Silberstein v SEC, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 15-00722.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.