⭐ Start off 2025 with a powerful boost to your portfolio: January’s freshest AI-picked stocksUnlock stocks

U.S. judge overturns South Carolina's gay marriage ban

Published 11/12/2014, 03:21 PM
© Reuters Kathy Stewart places a ring on the finger of her partner, Vicky Mangus, during a wedding ceremony outside of the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds office in Charlotte

By Harriet McLeod and Lawrence Hurley

CHARLESTON S.C./WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Wednesday struck down South Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage, ruling that the state is bound by a regional federal appeals court decision that struck down Virginia's similar law.

The ruling, along with decisions last week rejecting bans in Missouri, West Virginia and Kansas, are the latest in a series across the nation in which federal district courts have thrown out gay marriage bans. Gay marriage is legal in 32 of the 50 states.

U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel in Charleston said his decision will not take effect for one week to allow South Carolina time to appeal.

That could allow same-sex couples to file for marriage licenses or in some cases begin receiving them starting on Nov. 20 if the state is unable to obtain a further delay via the courts.

"We're ecstatic," said Colleen Condon, 44, who filed the lawsuit heard by Gergel after she and fiancée Nichols Bleckley, 43, were denied a marriage license in Charleston last month.

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, a Republican, said he would appeal Wednesday's ruling.

"We believe this office has an obligation to defend state law as long as we have a viable path to do so," Wilson said.

In his ruling, Gergel said he found no meaningful distinction between South Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage and the ban declared unconstitutional in Virginia. South Carolina is one of five states that are bound by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision to strike down Virginia's ban.

Although gay marriage advocates have had the upper hand in the legal battle over the past year, the landscape changed last week when a Cincinnati-based regional federal appeals court became the first to uphold gay marriage bans.

That decision by the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals backing bans in four states created a split within the courts and increased the chances that the Supreme Court will rule once and for all whether states have the right to ban gay marriage.

The high court has so far declined to take up any cases that would lead to a definitive ruling on gay marriage. In October, it allowed gay marriage to proceed in five states, including Virginia, when it refused to hear appeals in seven cases.

Separately, Kansas has asked the Supreme Court to block a ruling striking down that state's ban as litigation continues.

© Reuters. Kathy Stewart places a ring on the finger of her partner, Vicky Mangus, during a wedding ceremony outside of the Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds office in Charlotte

(Writing by Colleen Jenkins; Editing by Will Dunham)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.