Black Friday is Now! Don’t miss out on up to 60% OFF InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Former U.S. official urges Pentagon to skip buying new ICBMs

Published 12/03/2015, 09:25 PM
Updated 12/03/2015, 09:30 PM
Former U.S. official urges Pentagon to skip buying new ICBMs
BA
-
NOC
-
GD
-
LMT
-

By Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Former Defense Secretary William Perry on Thursday called for the Pentagon to skip replacing its aging stockpile of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), arguing that U.S. nuclear-armed submarines and a new long-range bomber program would provide sufficient deterrent value.

Perry, a close friend and mentor of the current defense secretary, Ash Carter, said the United States was on "the brink of a new nuclear arms race," that would be extremely expensive, and the ICBMs were not necessary as a deterrent force.

He said they also posed the greatest threat of an accidental nuclear war since they were easy to launch.

But he said he was skeptical that his recommendation would ever become reality, given political pressures to maintain parity with Russia in the area of nuclear weapons. Russia is in the process of retiring its Soviet-era ICBMs and replacing them with new weapons systems.

Perry's comments came a day after the Pentagon's chief arms buyer said the Defense Department viewed all three legs of the so-called nuclear "triad" - nuclear-armed submarines, a next-generation long-range bomber, and replacement of the current ICBMs - as priorities in its fiscal 2017 budget proposal.

But he said the Pentagon was still trying to secure additional funding for all three programs, beyond current budget levels, since they would otherwise crowd out funding warships, fighter jets and other conventional weapons that were also needed.

The Congressional Budget Office last January estimated that the administration's plans for nuclear forces will cost $348 billion over the next decade, or about $35 billion a year.

Funding for nuclear programs will have a big impact on U.S. weapons makers, including Northrop Grumman Corp (N:NOC), which won a contract valued at up to $80 billion to build a new long-range bomber for the Air Force. Boeing (N:BA) Co and Lockheed Martin Corp (N:LMT) have protested the contract award.

General Dynamics Corp (N:GD) has the lead on developing a replacement for the Ohio-class nuclear-armed submarines, along with Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc. The Air Force is just starting efforts to replace its current ICBM fleet.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.