🤓 Just 1 week into 2025: These 7 AI-picked stocks are up 9%+ eachUnlock Stocks

Rock band The Slants wants to reclaim slur for trademark

Published 01/09/2015, 01:57 PM
Updated 01/09/2015, 02:00 PM
Rock band The Slants wants to reclaim slur for trademark

By Diane Bartz

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Asian-American rock band The Slants argued in court on Friday that its name is a healthy reappropriation of a term usually considered a slur and that the band should be granted a trademark despite government objections.

The case could have implications for a higher-profile fight over whether the Washington Redskins team in the National Football League should lose its trademarks.

The Slants, which plays hard-charging grunge music it calls Chinatown Dance Rock, applied for a trademark in 2010 and was rejected on the grounds the name disparaged Asians. It reapplied in 2011, without mentioning that it was an Asian band, but the examiner looked at the earlier application and rejected it again.

Federal law prohibits registration of disparaging trademarks.

Ronald Coleman, a lawyer who argued for The Slants in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, said that the name did not disparage Asian-Americans but sought to reclaim it, much like the lesbian motorcycle club Dykes on Bikes, which did get a trademark.

Arguing for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Molly Silfen said that nothing prevented the band from using the name, so free speech rights were not abridged, but the band had not shown evidence that the slur was reclaimed.

The case is a twist on a fight over whether the Washington Redskins should lose its trademarks because that name disparages Native Americans.

The NFL franchise, in its lawsuit against the five Native Americans who successfully convinced a government tribunal in June to cancel the trademarks, said the provision violates the First Amendment.

On Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice told the court in the Redskins case it would intervene to defend the constitutionality of the Trademark Act's disparagement provision.

The case is In Re Simon Shiao Tam, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No 14-1203.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.