👀 Ones to watch: The MOST undervalued stocks to buy right nowSee Undervalued Stocks

ANALYSIS-Without China, economic rebalancing won't work

Published 09/21/2009, 04:51 PM
Updated 09/21/2009, 04:54 PM

By Lesley Wroughton and Emily Kaiser

WASHINGTON, Sept 21 (Reuters) - If the United States is going to succeed in its push for more balanced global economic growth, it must convince China, Germany and other big exporters there is no going back to the pre-crisis boom times.

In calling for the Group of 20 to back its framework for global rebalancing at the Pittsburgh leaders' summit this week, the United States is asking its big trading partners to abandon a strategy which paid off handsomely for years -- namely making goods for export to seemingly insatiable U.S. consumers.

Now that the financial crisis has shown that even Americans have their spending limits, the United States is hoping the time is ripe to finally make some progress on an issue which has generated much talk but virtually no action.

It is not a risk-free tactic for U.S. President Barack Obama. If he expects the big exporters to change their ways, he will have to make good on pledges to address the worsening U.S. fiscal position, which means making politically unpopular choices about spending and taxes.

"The key question here is whether the rest of the world believes the United States is really going to stop being the consumer of last resort," said Fred Bergsten, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington.

Bergsten said the financial crisis gave China and other big exporters a taste of the down side of relying on exports for growth. When trade collapsed, China's economy weakened even though its banks had largely avoided the bad assets that triggered the global recession.

The U.S. plan seeks to deliver a framework by November for rebalancing the world economy under which G20 nations would assess each other's policies to see if they were helping achieve that goal.

The International Monetary Fund would be at the center of the effort. Under the plan, the IMF would forecast the impact of policies and report back to the G20 twice a year with suggested policy adjustments.

BLAME GAME

The imbalances built up at the height of the credit boom, when U.S. consumers freely tapped rising home equity and credit cards to support their spending, have long been cause for consternation among economists.

As the U.S. trade deficit swelled, correspondingly large reserves piled up in China and elsewhere. Many economists argue that while these imbalances did not cause the crisis, they contributed to low interest rates that in turn encouraged investors to chase riskier assets in hopes of fatter returns.

But Beijing rejects that argument, with Chinese officials claiming lax regulatory oversight in rich nations was largely to blame for the financial crisis.

That is one reason why Eswar Prasad, an economics professor at Cornell University, thinks the United States will have a tough time convincing China to go along with the rebalancing effort.

"They see this as an underhanded attempt by the U.S. to bring this issue back to the table in a roundabout way," said Prasad, who travels to Asia regularly for talks with Chinese officials.

Past IMF attempts to tackle decades of U.S. over-consumption and to discourage excessive savings elsewhere failed, mostly because the IMF lacked the influence to wield the stick over the world's most important economies.

CARROTS AND STICKS

Washington is hoping carrots work better, and thinks elevating an issue that had been handled by finance ministers to the leaders level will prove more effective.

The Obama administration has struck a conciliatory tone in its dealings with Beijing, and has been fairly quiet over the thorny issue of China's currency policy. For years, Washington has pressed Beijing to let its yuan currency rise in value to move China's economy away from its reliance on exports.

The IMF launched a multilateral consultation process with the United States, Japan, China, Saudi Arabia and the euro area in 2006 to try and address the distortions of economic growth in the world but got little further than a pledge by countries to tackle trade and investment imbalances.

To strengthen the IMF's hand this time, the United States is pushing for an agreement at this week's G20 meeting to increase the voting power of large emerging market countries to give them more say in IMF decisions.

Domenico Lombardi, president of the Oxford Institute for Economic Policy, said by giving emerging economies more power at the IMF, countries like China would be recognized for their input in the world economy.

"The U.S. is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy whereby on the one hand they're asking China to become a more responsible player in the international monetary system by assuming commitments."

"On the other hand, the U.S. is willing to support any move in the reform of the IMF that would give China a higher role," said Lombardi, who is also a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute in Washington.

(Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.