🐂 Not all bull runs are created equal. November’s AI picks include 5 stocks up +20% eachUnlock Stocks

UPDATE 2-Britain has first failed gilt auction since 2002

Published 03/25/2009, 09:05 AM
BARC
-

(Adds Treasury and more analyst reaction, context)

By David Milliken

LONDON, March 25 (Reuters) - Britain suffered its first failed government bond auction since 2002 on Wednesday after bids fell more than 100 million pounds short of the 1.75 billion the government was trying to raise, causing gilt prices to tumble.

Market strategists said the result did not suggest Britain was facing an incipient funding crisis as it prepares to issue a record amount of gilts this year and next to fund extra spending through the recession.

Instead, they blamed opaque Bank of England gilt-buying plans for the fact the UK Debt Management Office could not find enough bidders for the 2049 gilt at an auction where there would usually be heavy demand from pension funds and insurers.

"There's a state of confusion in the market at the moment. It requires greater clarity from the BoE on what its aims are," said Sean Maloney, strategist at Nomura International.

BoE Governor Mervyn King said on Tuesday the central bank could scale back its gilt purchases if they rapidly boosted the economy. This caused gilt futures to fall by their most in nearly a month as investors worried the BoE might not buy the 75 billion pounds of assets they had expected in the next 3 months.

"The commentary that's been emerging over the last couple of days has been enough to leave auctions a little exposed, especially ones like these that aren't bought by the BoE," said Maloney.

The BoE currently only buys 5-25 year gilts in its asset purchase scheme, which started this month and aims to boost the money supply and plug the spending gap caused by the recession.

Investors also took fright at an apparent lack of consultation between the BoE and the DMO after the BoE cancelled plans to buy a 2015 gilt on Wednesday after the DMO said at short notice it would sell more of that issue next week.

The DMO said after the auction that the 2049 gilt was the riskiest part of the curve, and investors' shortage of funds at the end of the financial year might also have hurt demand.

Britain's last failed auction, in 2002, was for an index-linked gilt, and Wednesday's failure was the first since 1995 for a conventional gilt.

Germany suffered a failed auction in January for a 10-year Bund which roiled euro zone debt markets.

TREASURY RELAXED

Britain's finance ministry denied the auction's failure reflected any wider difficulty in funding the country's ballooning budget deficit, which is expected to require record gilt issuance this year and next.

"It would be wrong to read anything into the results of one auction event, which depends on the gilt on offer, demand and market conditions on the day," a Treasury spokesman said, citing recent comments from the head of the DMO.

"Demand for gilts clearly remains strong, and the small shortfall in funding today can be made good in future auctions," he added.

Investors bid to buy only 1.627 billion pounds of the 2049 gilt for a cover ratio of 0.93 times, in contrast to the last time the 2049 gilts was sold on Dec. 2, when there were more than twice as many bids than there were gilts for sale.

The June gilt future plunged to a session low -- down 192 ticks on the day -- after the auction, although it later recovered with technical support to stand around 60 ticks down.

The yield on the 2049 gilt itself rose more than 8 basis points to 4.54 percent after the auction as prices fell.

Moyeen Islam, a gilt strategist at Barclays Capital, backed the Treasury's view that the auction did not suggest Britain could face a major funding problem -- a concern voiced by opposition politicians.

"This is a poor result, but the bond itself isn't a poor bond. It's cheap and has attractive metrics. This is as much a reflection of market's ability to absorb risk as it is the ability of the government to sell gilts," he said. * For a table of the auction result, see [ID:nLAC003193] (Additional reporting by Christina Fincher and Sumeet Desai, editing by Chris Pizzey)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.