🐂 Not all bull runs are created equal. November’s AI picks include 5 stocks up +20% eachUnlock Stocks

U.S. pressing China on import surge causes - USTR

Published 10/22/2009, 01:58 PM
Updated 10/22/2009, 02:03 PM

* U.S. engaging China on "underlying causes" of surges

* High-level trade talks set for next week in China

* Obama working to reopen U.S. market to Chinese chicken

By Doug Palmer

WASHINGTON, Oct 22 (Reuters) - The United States is pressing China to change policies that overfuel its exports and led to President Barack Obama slapping duties on Chinese-made tires last month, a U.S. trade official said on Thursday.

"We have been engaging them in a dialogue in a way to address the underlying causes of surges," Tim Reif, general counsel in the U.S. Trade Representative's office, said in a speech at the National Press Club.

That, rather than U.S. industry groups filing additional anti-import surge petitions, would be "perhaps the most effective way of addressing this ongoing trade policy challenge," Reif said.

The statement was the clearest signal yet that the Obama administration is not eager for new "Section 421" trade petitions, like the one that led Obama last month to slap a 35-percent duty on Chinese-made tires.

U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke travel to China next week for high-level talks.

Obama's decision angered China and prompted expectations that a slew of other U.S. industries would file their own requests from protection.

TEXTILES NEXT?

So far that has not happened, but U.S. textile producers have said they are considering a case.

In an interview with Reuters after his speech, Reif said he would not presume to tell any industry group not to ask for Section 421 import relief.

But "we are eager to look at the most effective solution to problems and typically that is not tracked into one single direction," Reif said.

U.S. trade officials "definitely are talking" to the Chinese about government policies that cause surges in the first place, Reif said.

Reif argued in his speech that Obama's tire decision was justified by the facts showing tire imports had nearly tripled in four years and U.S. industry suffered significant harm.

But "it is also notable that just 10 days or two weeks after the Section 421 decision, many of us worked shoulder to shoulder with colleagues in the Department of Agriculture and colleagues on the Hill to try to reopen the American market for imports of poultry from China," Reif said.

U.S. lawmakers agreed as part of a spending bill recently signed into law by Obama to end a two-year ban on imports of poultry processed in China under a plan that requires more inspections.

China has not yet dropped a case at the World Trade Organization challenging U.S. poultry import restrictions.

But Reif said the two countries have a good record of resolving trade spats before formal litigation begins.

"It's notable that half the cases we have with China in the WTO, we resolved without having need for engaging in a panel. It's a very interesting fact," Reif said. (Reporting by Doug Palmer; Editing by Anthony Boadle)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.