✂ Fed’s first rate cut since 2020: Use our free Stock Screener to find new opportunities fastExplore for FREE

G20 backs extra IMF funds but sum, method unclear

Published 03/14/2009, 04:23 PM
Updated 03/14/2009, 04:24 PM
TGT
-

By Anna Willard

HORSHAM, England, March 14 (Reuters) - The G20 pledged on Saturday to shore up lending for emerging economies hit hard by the global financial crisis, but officials are still wrangling over how much money is needed, who will pay and how.

The thorniest issue is new money for the International Monetary Fund.

The IMF has said it needs an extra $250 billion to double its war chest to help countries needing emergency loans and it looks set to get that, given signals from its major shareholders Europe, the United States and Japan.

But collecting money from the IMF's largest members sidesteps the tricky political issue of giving emerging market economies a greater say in IMF affairs. And U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has muddied the water further, saying an additional $500 billion was needed.

In addition, some Asian countries scarred by tough IMF terms on loans during the 1997-98 Asia crisis prefer to focus on the Asia Development Bank, whose capital the G20 finance ministers pledged to triple at this weekend's meeting. [ID:nSTR461271]

Still the IMF remains the largest lender.

"My forecast was that we needed to double our resources," said IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn on Saturday.

"It may go even further. Tim Geithner suggested $500 billion. That might take time to reach, so doubling is the first priority. But if more is needed later, I'm sure more will be provided."

The target of $250 billion looks easily met.

Japan already has promised $100 billion. The United States and European Union each have signalled they could provide up to $100 billion. However, they are hoping that countries with large foreign exhchange reserves, notably China will also pay into the pot.

FINDING THE METHOD

The emerging countries say if they are to be expected to put money on the table, they should be given more power -- or quota -- on the board of the IMF.

In its statement the G20 finance ministers agreed to bring forward the next quota review and finish it by January 2011, rather than 2013. It did not, however, specify which method of raising money would be best, leaving more negotiations for the weeks ahead.

"We agreed on the urgent need to increase IMF resources very substantially. This could include further bilateral support, a significantly expanded and increased New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB), and an accelerated quota review," the G20 statement said.

The NAB is an existing agreement under which 25 member countries stand ready to lend to the IMF.

This is the preferred method of boosting IMF funds for the Europeans and the United States. However, China is not a member so the agreement would need to be expanded, a process which officials estimate could take up to three months, if China was to be included.

Countries can also contribute bilaterally and this is the method that Japan has chosen with its $100 billion loan.

A European source said on Saturday that Asian emerging markets were reluctant to lend to the IMF following the region's financial crisis in the 1990s.

They would prefer instead to increase funds to regional development banks, notably the Asian Development Bank.

(Reporting by Anna Willard; editing by Jamie McGeever;

Reuters Messaging: anna.willard.reuters.com@reuters.net; +33 1 49 49 5339; anna.willard@reuters.com))

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.