🤑 It doesn’t get more affordable. Grab this 60% OFF Black Friday offer before it disappears…CLAIM SALE

UPDATE 2-US arms buyer keeping WTO ruling out of tanker bids

Published 11/23/2009, 04:26 PM

* Can only hold taxpayer harmless from any damages

* Final bidding rules may not be ready by end of November

* Still plans to award contract by next summer (Adds reaction, quotes, background)

By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON, Nov 23 (Reuters) - The Pentagon's chief arms buyer dismissed calls from Boeing Co's allies in Congress to take a World Trade Organization ruling against Airbus into account in the potential $50 billion competition to supply mid-air refueling aircraft to the U.S. Air Force.

The trade issue was addressed when draft bidding rules were issued in September for a tanker rematch pitting Boeing against a team of Northrop Grumman Corp and Airbus parent EADS, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Ashton Carter said on Monday.

"The only action we can take at this point ... (is to make sure) that the taxpayer is held harmless in respect of any damages that end up being awarded in any of the cases before the WTO," he told a small group of reporters.

In September, the Pentagon noted that the WTO findings were preliminary and that Airbus, based in Toulouse, France, had filed a counterclaim against Chicago-headquartered Boeing.

"We need -- you need to pursue that process to a conclusion," Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn said on Sept. 24 in launching the rematch. "That's going to require a final ruling in each case. It's going to require completion of the appeals. That process is going to take several years."

The dispute centers on a complaint filed in 2004 by the U.S. Trade Representatives' Office alleging that Airbus received illegal subsidies from European governments to develop several of its aircraft, including the A330 model that would be the basis of the Northrop-EADS tanker.

Carter said the Pentagon still planned to award a contract for 179 tankers by next summer, a deal which a top Air Force official has called potentially worth $25 billion to $50 billion.

At stake is the first of three batches of aircraft that could cost more than $100 billion over coming decades. EADS plans to open a factory in Mobile, Alabama, for final assembly of its tankers if it wins. The competition has sparked fierce competition among lawmakers eager to bring jobs to voters.

"We've had obviously criticism from both parties," Carter said Monday of the draft bidding rules. "I suppose that was destined to be."

He said the Pentagon may or may not meet its original target of putting out the final tanker bidding rules by the end of this month, 60 days or so after publishing the draft request for proposal.

"It'll happen when we're done doing a thorough job of considering all the questions and suggestions we've gotten," he said.

Northrop has argued the Pentagon appears to have set up a kind of "price-shootout" that may favor a smaller, cheaper Boeing plane such as the modified 767 it offered last time.

Lawmakers from states that would benefit from a Boeing victory called a news conference last week to renew their push to factor the WTO's interim ruling into the Pentagon's evaluation of the rival bids.

In its preliminary ruling in September, the WTO ruled the Europeans had given billions of dollars in subsidies to Airbus for the design and manufacture of large aircraft in breach of free-trade rules, according to Boeing backers' accounts of the confidential findings.

Rep. Norm Dicks, a member of the House of Representatives Defense Appropriations subcommittee, urged the Pentagon at the time to add as much as $5 million per plane to the Northrop/EADS bid to "neutralize" advantages allegedly obtained by Airbus through illegal subsidies.

Randy Belote, a Northrop Grumman spokesman, said his company fully supports the Defense Department's position "that the commercial aircraft subsidies dispute being addressed by the WTO has no place in the procurement of U.S. defense systems."

Boeing said last week it appreciated the bipartisan efforts for a "fair" tanker competition from lawmakers representing Washington, Kansas, Missouri, Connecticut, Illinois and New York who spoke out Wednesday in favor of factoring in the interim WTO findings.

(Reporting by Jim Wolf; Editing by Tim Dobbyn and Richard Chang) ((jim.wolf@thomsonreuters.com; +1-202-898-8402; Reuters Messaging: jim.wolf.reuters.com@reuters.net))

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.