Breaking News
Get 55% Off 0
🍎 🍕 Less apples, more pizza 🤔 Have you seen Buffett’s portfolio recently?
Explore for Free

Will Powell join fellow fed members in endorsing a less hawkish stance?

Published Oct 14, 2023 07:44AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters.
 
EUR/USD
-0.17%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
GBP/USD
-0.18%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
USD/JPY
-0.00%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
EUR/GBP
+0.05%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
EUR/JPY
-0.22%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
GBP/JPY
-0.23%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Yasin Ebrahim

Investing.com -- Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell is set to take center stage next week when he speaks at the Economic Club of New York on Thursday, where the focus will be on whether the Fed chief endorses recent remarks from fellow Fed members that an ongoing rise in Treasury yields could reduce the need for a final rate hike this year.

“In light of recent comments from other Fed officials, market participants will be watching closely to see if the leadership at the Fed share the same view that higher market rates if sustained will reduce the need for one final hike this year,” MUFG said in a note.

Since the Fed’s September meeting, the overarching narrative of ‘higher for longer’ rates has swept through markets, and put the bond market on course correction. A sharp selloff in Treasuries has pushed yields, particularly on the longer maturity 10-and 30-year bonds to 20-year highs.

The surge in yields, which San Francisco Fed president Mary Daly recently suggested is equivalent to about one rate hike, would suggest that the risk of lifting rates too high and tipping the economy into recession is growing.

How much will the threat of ‘two-sided’ risks influence Powell?

At the most recent FOMC press conference in September, Powell flagged the risk of overtightening – or lifting rates too far above “sufficiently restrictive” levels – as an emerging concern.

Against this growing two-sided risk, the “commonsense thing to do,” Powell said, is to “move a little more slowly” on rate hikes as you approach sufficiently restrictive. With many at the Fed still arguing that the impact of the 11-rate hikes seen so far are yet to fully filter through the economy, the need to move more slowly on tightening appears to be on the up and up.

A caution approach toward monetary policy has been echoed in recent weeks by several Federal Open Market Committee participants.

“There appears to have been a coordinated attempt by Fed officials to signal more concern over the sharp move higher in U.S. yields which has contributed to a significant tightening in US financial conditions that is equivalent to one or two 25bps rate hikes by the Fed,” MUFG added.

This apparent shift in tone from Fed members to a less hawkish bias was more evident following release of the FOMC September meeting minutes, when a “majority of participants judged that one more increase in the target federal funds rate at a future meeting would likely be appropriate.”

Markets appear to be betting that the Fed is done, with interest-rate futures pricing now implying a less than 30% chance of another rate hike this year.

The potential perils of endorsing a less hawkish stance

But endorsing the view of his Fed colleagues, isn’t without risk for Powell. It may cement bets that the Fed rate-hike cycle is over, muddying the Fed’s higher for longer narrative, potentially undoing some of recent tightening in financial conditions.

"If those higher long-term yields are higher because their expectations about what we're going to do has changed, then we might actually need to follow through in their expectations in order to maintain those yields,” Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari said earlier this week. 

Kashkari remarks serve as reminder about the Fed's prior reservations about "unwarranted" easing in financial conditions, especially if driven by misperception about its reaction function.  

Powell may give nod to rising yields, but not much more 

Powell may, however, also opt to pour cold water on the significance of the move higher in Treasury yields, Scotiabank says, attributing it to a litany of “temporary forces” including the larger-than-expected issuance, or supply, of Treasuries with “bigger and more frequent auction sizes.”

The U.S. Treasury has issued a wave of U.S. government bonds amid plans to borrow a near-record $1.859 trillion of debt in the second half of 2023, to refill its coffers that were depleted - after running down reserves to fund government operations - following the debt ceiling debacle earlier this year.

While the potential risk of mid-November government shutdown could spark a fresh need for the Treasury to raise more cash, Powell could argue that the pace at which the Treasury is filling its confers will eventually slow, easing the supply pressures on U.S. government bonds that have pushed yields higher.

Lean into data dependence, maintain flexibility

Recent history would suggest that Powell isn’t likely to imply that the Fed could be done with rate hikes. Keeping the projection for a final quarter-point hike this year has not only allowed the Fed to maintain flexibility on policy, but also help manage market expectations, which had been, up until recently, fighting the Fed’s 'higher for longer' narrative at every turn.

Powell may lean into the recent mix of economic data to reiterate the need for the Fed to maintain the status quo data dependent policy.

Recent data showed that core CPI is on the move higher, again. The September payrolls report surprised to the upside. And economic growth, which Powell said in September was a factor behind FOMC members reducing their rate-cut forecasts to two from four next year, remains resilient.  

“This is the fifth consecutive quarter in which GDP growth has been blowing the barn doors off of consensus expectations with the median tracking for Q3 at 3% q/q SAAR,” Scotiabank Economics said in a note.

With the Nov. 1 Fed meeting just weeks away, and pause on rate hikes largely baked into markets, Powell may likely opt for a balance in his remarks by acknowledging the recent rise in yields, but suggest more time is needed to assess whether they’re likely to persist, while reiterating the Fed’s data dependence stance.

This may appease the monetary policy hawks, the number of which continue to dwindle, and the doves, allowing the Fed to maintain the status quo, rather than shifting communication at a time when many agree that the last mile toward 2% inflation will be challenging.

Ultimately, the extent to which Powell endorses a less hawkish stance, or not, may well depend on the extent to which the recent tightening in financial conditions has raised the risk of a hard landing, or something breaking in the economy. 

Powell is set to deliver his speech on Oct. 19 at 12pm ET. 

Will Powell join fellow fed members in endorsing a less hawkish stance?
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (17)
sob story
sob story Oct 15, 2023 11:09AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
the fed has failed to maintain price stability. why are they in charge of fixing the problem they created?
Ri O
Ri O Oct 14, 2023 6:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Barbara Bernard Windcrest Capital "market will bottom 2 years after peak inflation (approx June 2024)"...." It's premature to be giddy".."100%of the time there is an inverted yield curve you get a recession. " There will be no soft landing.
Otis Grant
Otis Grant Oct 14, 2023 6:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You post this random opinion like it's a fact. It's not, and there is a first time for everything. Have fun missing out.
Chris Hall
Chris Hall Oct 14, 2023 3:49PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
crash this system need more bankruptcy need more of the top 10% buying up every thing
Jeanette Signals
Jeanette Signals Oct 14, 2023 3:49PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
hi do you invest on crypto currencies?
Otis Grant
Otis Grant Oct 14, 2023 3:49PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
No we just need the top 10% to pay the same percentage in taxes as the lowest paid workers. Deficit would be gone in one year
Kerry Ditto
Kerry Ditto Oct 14, 2023 1:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
fed pivot rally begins now?
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Oct 14, 2023 1:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Sure pal, just like the Sunday rally of 1999.
ZS Beck
ZS Beck Oct 14, 2023 12:57PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
No more rates are needed. Needs to wait another 6 months and check the inflation then. That's how it works. The rate-raising effects come later. New businesses will go belly up if they can't grow or get a loan to continue because the cheapest loan is 8.5%.
Tyrone Jackson
Tyrone Jackson Oct 14, 2023 12:37PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Retail sales at n a recession already. REPO real estate in my are went from 1 sheet a month to 23 sheets this month in this area . They had adjustable rate mortgages most likely or losing their income stream due to other factors. Now 2 wars - and oil headed to 125 a barrel. The damaged is done and just like the fed going to zero interest rates- they prove again they they know nothing more than anyone here.
Otis Grant
Otis Grant Oct 14, 2023 12:37PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You're area just sucks
Rob Sanders
Rob Sanders Oct 14, 2023 12:37PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You are seeing clearly seeing the starting trend.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Oct 14, 2023 12:37PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Real estate repos? Something tells me you don't know what you are talking about.
Otis Grant
Otis Grant Oct 14, 2023 12:37PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Cherry pick some more obscure data and ignore the ocean of data that says we are not close to recession
John Avenetti
John Avenetti Oct 14, 2023 12:01PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
it doesn't matter the dsnage is done. the Fed is a private banking cartel
Otis Grant
Otis Grant Oct 14, 2023 11:33AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Let's see 6 months ago after banks collapsed. The fed said that the terminal rate would be 5.1; now it's all changed, but people take their one year projections like gospel l.
Ronald Warren
Ronald Warren Oct 14, 2023 10:12AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The FED doesn't need to raise rates anymore. A recession is already coming. The major bankers told us everything we need to know this week. Defaults are on the rise. People are spending their savings. According to their ledgers, Americans are spending less. The big variable is increased costs because of high oil prices. The FED can't control that. Now we wait for the recession, so rates can decrease. Honestly, inflation will never be 2% again. They caused all this by printing too much money. Print us some more, so we can afford to live.
Casador Del Oso
Casador Del Oso Oct 14, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
This article clearly illustrates that no one has a clue what will happen. Good penmanship but no solid conclusion.
Warm Camp
Warm Camp Oct 14, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The only honest conclusion would be an admission that the system is bankrupt, both financially and morally. Of course, such a conclusion would not be welcome on this site at this point. Hence, no conclusion.
Tyrone Jackson
Tyrone Jackson Oct 14, 2023 9:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Good comment
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Apple
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email