💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

US Republican states move to keep ESG investing lawsuit in Texas court

Published 03/01/2023, 01:34 PM
Updated 03/01/2023, 01:43 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton takes the stage to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Dallas, Texas, U.S., August 5, 2022.  REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo

By Daniel Wiessner

(Reuters) - Republican-led U.S. states have added a new plaintiff to their lawsuit challenging a rule that allows socially conscious investing by employee retirement plans, in a bid to thwart the Biden administration's attempt to wrest the case away from a conservative judge.

The states on Tuesday filed an amended complaint in an Amarillo, Texas, federal court where they had filed the lawsuit in January, adding a business owner who lives in the city, which they said should erase any doubt that the case belongs there.

The Biden administration last month accused the states of "judge shopping" by filing the lawsuit in Amarillo. The only sitting judge there is U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, an appointee of former Republican President Donald Trump. Kacsmaryk's court has become a favored destination for Republicans challenging Biden administration regulations.

The 25 states say a U.S. Department of Labor rule allowing retirement plans to consider environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors in selecting investments will jeopardize retirement savings and should be struck down.

The U.S. Department of Justice, which is defending the rule, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The government has said the rule is valid because it still requires retirement plans to put financial considerations ahead of ESG factors.

In a motion to transfer the case last month, the Biden administration said states can only file lawsuits in federal courts located in their capital cities. Texas is a plaintiff in the lawsuit, but the administration said it is only a "resident" of Austin, its capital.

The states on Tuesday said the addition of Alex Fairly, who owns a medical billing negotiation firm and lives in Amarillo, moots the motion to transfer the case.

And the Biden administration does not need to seek a transfer over concerns about Kacsmaryk's partiality, they said.

"Any public interest in impartial consideration of cases is protected by statutes requiring recusal if a judge can reasonably be believed to be biased or prejudiced," the states said.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton takes the stage to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Dallas, Texas, U.S., August 5, 2022.  REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo

The filings came on the same day that the U.S. House of Representatives voted to repeal the ESG rule. A Senate vote is scheduled for Wednesday, but Republicans are unlikely to muster the votes to overcome a veto by Democratic President Joe Biden.

The Justice Department has moved to transfer at least two other cases brought by Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton that were assigned to Trump-appointed judges.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.