💎 Fed’s first rate cut since 2020 set to trigger market. Find undervalued gems with Fair ValueSee Undervalued Stocks

U.S. labor board limits gag clauses in severance agreements

Published 02/22/2023, 04:02 PM
Updated 02/22/2023, 04:26 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The seal of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is seen at their headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 14, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

By Daniel Wiessner

The National Labor Relations Board has ruled that laid-off workers cannot be required to sign agreements that contain confidentiality clauses and other provisions that could deter them from exercising their rights under federal labor law in exchange for receiving severance.

The board in a 3-1 decision on Tuesday overturned a pair of Trump-era rulings that said severance agreements only violate federal labor law when employers engage in other unlawful conduct when asking workers to sign them.

The NLRB's Democratic majority said those rulings were misguided and "granted employers carte blanche to offer employees severance agreements that include unlawful provisions."

The case involves a Michigan hospital operator, McLaren Macomb, that furloughed 11 employees when the surgery center where they worked was closed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The board said it was illegal for the company to offer the workers severance agreements that included confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions because they could be discouraged from filing complaints with the NLRB or publicizing labor disputes.

Lawyers for the company did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Nor did a lawyer for the Office and Professional Employees International Union, which represented the furloughed workers.

The NLRB in recent months has chipped away at key Trump-era precedent that was seen as favoring businesses over unions and workers. That includes a decision allowing employees to picket on property where they work but that is not owned by their employer and a proposal to roll back changes that Republican board members had made to the union election process.

NLRB member Marvin Kaplan, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, dissented on Tuesday. He said there was no evidence that the decisions tossed out by the majority had led the board to uphold illegal severance agreements.

"And pure speculation does not provide a reasonable justification for overruling Board precedent," Kaplan wrote.

The case is McLaren Macomb, National Labor Relations Board, No. 07–CA–263041.

For McLaren Macomb: Brian Shekell of Clark Hill

For the union: Scott Brooks of Gregory, Moore, Brooks & Clark

For the NLRB general counsel: Tony Smith

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The seal of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is seen at their headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 14, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

Read more:

Contract employees' right to organize restored by U.S. labor board

U.S. labor board moves to nix Trump-era union election rule

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.