The Gunfight at DOGE City: Will the Bond Vigilantes Intervene?

Published 02/24/2025, 01:28 AM

“The Gunfight at Dodge City” is a 1959 Western film. After his brother the sheriff is murdered, Bat Masterson is elected to the job of sheriff and is determined to find the killer and make Dodge City safe.

Today, there are gunfights going on in DOGE City to restore fiscal policy. Will the new sheriff in town get the job done, or will the Bond Vigilantes do it?

After all, the Fed did lower the federal funds rate (FFR) by 100bps from September 18 through December 18 last year, but the Bond Vigilantes immediately expressed their dismay that monetary policy was stimulating an economy that didn’t need to be stimulated and enabling fiscal excesses. They did so by pushing the bond yield higher by 100bps.US 2-Year and 10-Year Yields vs Fed Funds Target Rate

In the past, the Fed lowered the FFR from cyclical peaks because the peaks were followed by recessions. There has been no recession this time.Fed Funds Rate

Now, consider a few of the recent developments that led up to the trouble brewing in DOGE City:

(1) Summer 2024. Elon Musk floated the concept of DOGE in discussions with Donald Trump during the summer of 2024 as the then-former President campaigned for a second term. In an August campaign event, Trump said that, if elected, he would consider giving Musk an advisory role on how to streamline the government. Musk immediately tweeted, “I am willing to serve.”

(2) October 27, 2024. Elon Musk first declared that DOGE would cut $2 trillion from the federal budget on October 27, 2024, during a Trump rally at Madison Square Garden. Over the 12 months through January, the federal government’s budget deficit totaled $2.14 trillion.US Fed Govt Budget Deficit & Marketable Treasury Securities

(3) January 8, 2024. However, on January 8, 2025, Musk stated in an interview with Mark Penn that achieving the $2 trillion cut was unlikely and that the best-case outcome would be around $1 trillion. Over the past 12 months through January, federal government outlays totaled $7.1 trillion, with $6.0 trillion in mandatory outlays (including Social Security, Medicare, health, income security, national defense, and net interest).Total vs Non-Discretionary vs Discretionary Outlays

Net interest outlays alone totaled $920.6 billion, exceeding the $910.2 billion spent on defense over the last 12 months.US Fed Govt Outlays

(4) January 20, 2025. On Inauguration Day, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Establishing and Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency.’” The order renamed the existing United States Digital Service “the United States DOGE Service” (USDS). Within the USDS, a new organization was established, the US DOGE Service Temporary Organization, which is headed by the USDS administrator (Musk) and is scheduled to be terminated on July 4, 2026.

Each government agency must establish a “DOGE Team of at least four employees, which may include Special Government Employees, hired or assigned within thirty days of the date of this Order. Agency Heads shall select the DOGE Team members in consultation with the USDS Administrator. Each DOGE Team will typically include one DOGE Team Lead, one engineer, one human resources specialist, and one attorney.”

The goal of this Executive Order is to modernize “federal technology and software to maximize efficiency and productivity.” To achieve that, the DOGE Teams will have “full and prompt access to all unclassified agency records, software systems, and IT systems.”

Needless to say, DOGE has stirred up lots of controversy in Washington. There are almost daily headlines on DOGE’s success at finding lots of inefficiencies, waste, and possible fraud within the government accounts. Many of these headlines are generated by Musk’s tweets on X.

There is lots of pushback by Democrats, who are challenging the legality of the DOGE Boys’ flipping through government files. Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who had served as the director of the Congressional Budget Office, compared DOGE to the former Grace Commission, which had zero of its 150 proposals enacted.

Federal Budget II: In Bessent We Trust. It’s too soon to tell how much DOGE will reduce government spending. However, Treasury Secretary Bessent is certainly aware of the need to reduce the federal budget deficit relative to nominal GDP. He has committed to halving this ratio from 6% to 3%.US Fed Govt Budget Deficit

This ratio was last at 3% during Q4-2015 (2.93%, to be exact). Since then, Trump 1.0 tax cuts drove it up to 4.65% during Q4-2019 (just before the pandemic), and Biden’s outlays raised it over 6% during Q4-2024.

Trump 2.0 is borrowing a page from the Clinton administration’s playbook, specifically the one in which Robert Rubin and James Carville warned Clinton that he had to respect the power of the Bond Vigilantes and maintain fiscal discipline.

On February 6, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that he and President Trump are less concerned about the federal funds rate (FFR) and instead are hoping to contain the 10-year Treasury yield. Bessent’s message to the Bond Vigilantes was that he has explained to President Trump that they have the power to stymie his fiscal agenda.

However, on February 12, Trump posted the following on his Truth Social platform: “Interest Rates should be lowered, something which would go hand in hand with upcoming Tariffs!!!”

That assertion flew in the face of economists’ expectations that tariffs would fuel inflation and postpone rate cuts as well as what Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told US lawmakers the day before: that the Fed was in no rush to cut its short-term interest rate again given an economy that is strong overall.

The Bond Vigilantes are biding their time, waiting to see how much the Trump administration can slow the increase in federal spending because of the efforts of the DOGE Boys. If they don’t deliver enough spending cuts, there could be a gunfight at DOGE City, with the Bond Vigilantes shooting holes in the Trump administration’s fiscal agenda, including the extension of his tax cuts.

It is good that Bessent understands the power of the Bond Vigilantes. In effect, he represents their interests within the Trump administration. Eric and I believe that by appointing Bessent as Treasury Secretary and establishing DOGE, Trump bought his administration some time to deal with the federal budget mess.

Federal Budget III: Tracking The Bond Vigilantes.

“Bond Vigilantes” is the phrase I coined in July 1983 to refer to bond investors, acting in their own financial interests, when their activity drives up bond yields out of belief that the government will fail in its duty to keep the budget deficit from ballooning and inflation contained via fiscal and monetary policy.

They’ll demand greater yield for their long-term bond investments if they think the value of their investment will be eroded by inflation over the term. Higher bond market yields effectively push up other interest rates—so it’s as if bond investors are taking fiscal and monetary discipline into their own hands, vigilante style, when the government drops the ball. (See The Bond Vigilantes excerpt from my 2018 book Predicting the Markets.)

One way to monitor the activities of the Bond Vigilantes is to compare the 10-year Treasury bond yield to the growth in nominal GDP on a y/y basis.10-Year Yield vs Nominal GDP Growth

When the spread is positive while the economy is growing, they are doing what they can to slow it down. They were asleep at the reins during the 1960s and 1970s, when inflation got out of hand. They were much more vigilant during the 1980s and early 1990s.10-Year Yield Minus Nominal GDP Growth

The Bond Vigilantes were stymied by the Fed’s QE (quantitative easing, i.e., buying bonds) and ZIRP (i.e., zero-interest-rate policy) from 2008 through 2022, i.e., between the Great Financial Crisis and the Great Virus Crisis, when the Fed’s monetary stance was ultra easy. The bond market was rigged by the Fed during this period. The Fed tightened monetary policy by raising the FFR and ending QE from March 2022 through August 2024, allowing the bond yield to normalize.

The 10-year Treasury bond yield is currently about 4.50%, having risen back up to around where it was before the Great Financial Crisis. The spread between the bond yield and the growth rate in nominal GDP was -70bps during Q4-2024. It remains around zero currently. Nominal GDP growth was 5.0% y/y during Q4.10-Year Yield - Monthly Chart

We conclude that the Bond Vigilantes aren’t saddling up just yet to ride into DOGE City for a gunfight with the Trump administration. But ask us again if the yield jumps above 5.0% with attendant widespread fear that it is heading toward 6.0%.

The Bond Vigilantes have never been potentially more powerful than right now given that total federal public debt outstanding is a record $36.2 trillion with a record $28.5 trillion in marketable US Treasury securities.Total US Public Debt vs Marketable Securities

Original Post

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.