Right now, oil production shut in the Gulf of Mexico is at 91%, just under 2 million barrels a day. Natural gas production is 61% shut in. Let us pray for minimal damage and for no loss of life.
Oil prices are also getting support because Saudi Arabia and Russia may be having second thoughts about raising oil output again next year. The Wall Street Journal reported that:
“Saudi Arabia is considering canceling OPEC plans for an oil output hike early next year, senior Saudi oil advisers said, as Covid-19 cases in many parts of the world rise and the expected return of Libyan crude threatens to swell global supplies.”
In April, the 13-member, Saudi-led Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and 10 Russia-led producers agreed to carry out record production cuts of 9.7 million barrels a day, as the initial flare-up of the new coronavirus shuttered economies around the world, grounding flights and public transportation and closing offices and factories.
The accord called for producers to return that production gradually, in stages of two million barrels of added crude a day, every six months, assuming the worst of the pandemic would fade before the end of this year. In the summer, the group moved ahead with the first hike in output. The next extra two million barrels a day were expected to start flowing in January according to the Wall Street Journal. Oil advisers in Saudi Arabia now say Riyadh is considering postponing the move until the end of the first quarter.
First, we had “Peak Oil” and now we get “Peak Demand”. OPEC says they expect demand in most developed countries to fall by about 27% over next 25 years. An interesting read with some valid points but their long-term peak demand theory is probably greatly exaggerated. Predications of “peak demand” has the same flaws that “peak oil” production had. Part of the report is being influenced by the shock in demand drop after coronavirus. They are predicting our consumption patterns will change forever. Maybe not.
Market Forces will drive the energy mix and while the world is making major shifts to alternative fuels, it is unlikely that the report is considering all sides of the equation of alternatives. It does not cover the manufacturing and disposal, footprint of alternatives like wind and solar. It fails to account for the environmental impact of electric cars and whether they will be scalable on a global market. Billions of electric batteries and solar panels and wind turbines that have to be produced and eventually disposed of.
There is also a long way to go to close the reliability gap with many alternatives. Take a look at California. Even so-called clean hydrogen fuel is not that clean. Researchers at Rystad Energy says that making the hydrogen gas currently generates more carbon emissions globally than the airline industry did at its peak.
I will expand on this more in the future, but oil and gas still give the economy the best bang for the buck and will be around for a long time. While the energy mix will change global growth we will see oil and gas exceed pre-coronavirus levels in years not decades. Economics and the higher cost and less reliability of alternatives means the growth in the developing world will still use oil and gas. It will also be used cleaner as carbon capturing technologies might make more sense than having a wind turbine everywhere you look scaring the land and killing birds.