Selloff or Market Correction? Either Way, Here's What to Do NextSee Overvalued Stocks

Energy ETFs Investors Should Keep An Eye On

Published 03/05/2014, 01:20 AM
Updated 03/09/2019, 08:30 AM
US2000
-
NG
-
IMOB
-
IFNC
-
DJUSRE
-

Most sector ETFs have hit new year-to-date highs. Some sector investments like SPDR Select Sector Health Care (XLV) are not only blazing a trail in 2014, they’re crushing all-time records. Meanwhile, REIT ETFs like iShares DJ Real Estate (IYR) have shaken off the hangover of 2013’s massive spike in rates and have rallied back to take advantage of declining 10-year bond yields.

IYR 9 Months

In contrast, a few segments of the economy have failed to significantly engage market participants. SPDR Select Sector Financials (XLF) remains below its 52-week peak. More noticeably, SPDR Select Sector Energy (XLE) is still slightly negative for 2014. While some prominent advisers and commentators maintain that uncertainty in Central Europe adds to pressures on energy prices, or at least impedes deflationary concerns surrounding energy use, I am not seeing institutional buying interest in XLE.

At least in terms of relative strength, the declining growth in emerging regions of the world has given energy investors fits for years. Even escalating conflicts between Russia and Europe do not provide enough support for the idea that energy price inflation will support the broadest energy ETF. That said, enthusiasts could look to energy services for their fix. The iShares DJ Energy Equipment and Services Fund (IEZ) has been far more successful at taking advantage of geopolitical conflict.

IEZ-DJ-Equip-Explore
Another school of thought is that investors ought to consider all energy producers and invest in those with the premier fundamental picture. I do not subscribe to that school of thinking. If it were this basic, one would likely gravitate toward Russian equities. Market Vectors Russia (RSX) has a 42.5% weighting in energy and Russian stocks are remarkably cheap. A price-to-earnings of 5.7 and a price-to-book of 0.7… where would you ever find a “deal” like that?

The problem with this simplistic analysis is that Russian equities are perpetually inexpensive with a long-term cyclically-adjusted price-to-earnings ratio (CAPE) average of 8.5. What’s more, with new technologies and new discoveries by U.S. producers, earnings/revenue growth at Russian oil/natural gas producers may be muted. Last, but hardly least, the technical picture for RSX is particularly poor with the exchange-traded fund exhibiting price movement akin to a “triple top” or “head-n-shoulders”  pattern between September and late December of 2013.

RSX-Triple-Top
Still another school might ignore fundamentals in favor of a momentum-based, decision-making process. When compared to an appropriate small-cap benchmark, like the Russell 2000, PowerShares Small Cap Energy (PSCE) has an impressive combination of  1-month momentum and longer-term outperformance. This exchange-traded fund tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Energy Index, investing the bulk of its assets in small stocks that engage in the business of producing, distributing or servicing energy related products, including oil and gas exploration and production, refining and oil services.

PSCE-Versus-Russell-2000


Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.