
Please try another search
DeFi tokens surged as investors lost trust in centralized exchanges post FTX.
After FTX/Alameda Research imploded, we are seeing a dual migration of digital assets. As bank runs threaten centralized exchanges, decentralized exchanges are taking up the trading volume. Consequently, DEX tokens are surging ahead of their CEX counterparts.
The decade-old mantra “not your keys, not your coins” seems to have taken full effect after the FTX collapse. Decentralized exchange Uniswap is getting into the top range of the world’s CEXes. In the last 24 hours, Uniswap DEX achieved $1.10 billion trading volume or $2.85 billion since November 13th.
Comparatively, the second largest CEX, Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN), is on a downward trajectory, at $1.9 billion, a -16% reduction since Monday. Given the wide gap between employees servicing both platforms, fewer than 100 on Uniswap vs. over 5,000 on Coinbase, this is quite telling.
As a result of this spike in self-custody and decentralized finance, DEX tokens are also on the upswing. According to Delphi Digital, the DEX basket of tokens is up by +24% vs. the equivalent CEX basket, which is down by -2% since November 11th.
Image credit: Delphi Digital
DEX basket of tokens consists of key players in the DeFi ecosystem, including DYDX/USD, which popularized perpetual trading. Other weighted DEX tokens are UNI, SUSHI/USD, BAL/USD, PERP/USD, CAKE/USD, and GMX/USD. They were pitted against the CEX basket consisting of FTT, BNB, GT, ASD, CRO, HT, KCS, OKB, and MX.
From Nov. 7 to Nov. 8, DyDx saw a massive +392% volume increase, followed by another +100% uptick from Sunday to Monday, at $1.05 billion. However, the wide-scale industry FUD has suppressed DyDx trading volume back to under the $300 million range.
Meanwhile, Bitcoins have been exiting CEX wallets at a record pace. According to glassnode, the BTC migration from CEX into self-custody wallets is unfolding at a historic rate of 106k BTC/month. Over the last week, this accounts for ~$3.7 billion worth of bitcoins.
Predictably, hardware wallet providers are having a field day. Both Ledger and Trezor are seeing historic sales numbers this week.
Likewise, Josef Tetek, Bitcoin analyst at Trezor reported an exponential rise in sales since November 7th. Predictably, Bitcoin dominance is also rising, just as it was after the Terra meltdown. If one excludes manipulative centralized tokens like FTX (FTT) and non-crypto stablecoins, Bitcoin’s realized dominance is at an all-time high since December 2017, at 59%.
It seems that the FTX collapse served to further differentiate Bitcoin, as core P2P value without masters, against the centralized crypto layer built after Bitcoin popularized the very concept of digital assets.
So far, FTX’s multi-layered fraud revealed that the exchange misappropriated up to $10 billion to prop up SBF’s original venture, the Alameda Research hedge fund. Over the weekend, the situation was exacerbated with a purported hack draining at least $400 million from what was left of users’ funds.
Former senior engineer at FTX, Yung Dot, had also revealed an FTX backdoor called augmented deficit decoder (ADD). Originally, the program was supposed to protect the FTX codebase, but it can also be turned to obfuscate transactions, therefore facilitating the “wrongdoing by executives”. Former FTX engineer Yung Dot said,
“Our ADD that we had spent four years working on was now being used fraudulently with very little regard for our wishes. Now we are left with this – lots of questions.”
Overall, Blockworks research found that between 25% to 40% of crypto-oriented funds have their assets trapped or exposed in the FTX collapse. The contagion damage could then range between $1 billion to $5 billion, on top of lost user funds and the loss of industry-wide confidence.
Comparatively, 2022 has been the year of DeFi hacks, at over $3 billion across 125 hacks. October alone had seen 11 hacks that drained $718 million from 11 DeFi protocols. Tellingly, most of the damage came from blockchain bridges, as well-known central points of failure.
Because these bridges serve as intermediary asset repositories between blockchain networks, hackers have been exploiting the lack of node redundancy to the maximum. Ronin Bridge, connecting Axie Infinity to Ethereum, is still the top loser at $620 million lost. Wormhole Bridge, connecting Ethereum and Avalanche to Solana, ranks second, at $320 million. In third place is Nomad Bridge, having lost $190 million.
However, even CEXes are not exempt from bridge attacks, as Binance Bridge was subject to a potential $600 million attack. Interestingly, Binance quickly halted it after CZ asked BSC validators to suspend operations, showcasing an upside in blockchain centralization. Where does that leave the crypto space?
On the DEX side of the equation, much work has to be done on code auditing, while CEXes are going in the direction of proof-of-reserves and proof-of-liabilities. As the third, originating party, Bitcoin remains a safe haven, immune to both code abuse and centralized scheming.
Trump’s crypto reserve proposal briefly boosted Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, SOL, and ADA before fading. His statements fueled a "Pump & Dump" effect, adding to market...
Bitcoin’s (BTC/USD) price experienced significant volatility, dropping to $78k before rising to $95,000 due to Trump’s cryptocurrency reserve comments, then settling around...
Bitcoin plunges over 20% from its ATH Crypto liquidations reached $773,28 million over the past 24 hours BTC ETFs experience record outflows this week Trump’s trade tariffs...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.