data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8612e/8612e19ca747326f09c2f7f9ca9cf02eb2dd5315" alt="Bitcoin price today: stays below $90k as tariffs, macro fears weigh on sentiment"
Please try another search
Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has come under intense scrutiny after MPs published a damning report into how big corporations enjoy a "cosy relationship" with the taxman.
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC), chaired by Margaret Hodge, called for senior officials to face punish-ment for a series of costly errors and failures that has meant more than £25 billion in tax revenue going uncollected.
Hodge, speaking on the BBC's Today Programme, said: "It is a very uncomfortable state of affairs. I find it in-credible that we were brought this information by a whistle-blower. If that person hadn't come forward, we would never have known about this."
MPs demanded explanations of why officials wrongly claimed they could not discuss deals with the committee and gave "imprecise, inconsistent and potentially misleading" answers.
The report represents the conclusions of a fiery public inquiry by the influential committee that at one point saw the country's top tax official, Dave Hartnett, accused by the chair of lying.
Banking giant Goldman Sachs was allowed to skip a multimillion pound interest bill on unpaid tax on bonuses after Hartnett was wrongly advised there was a "legal impediment" to collecting it. The potential cost to the taxpayer is officially put at £8 million but the committee was given evidence from whistle-blower Osita Mba, a solicitor for HMRC, that the sum could be as high as £20 million.
But HMRC flatly rejected the committee's conclusion that there were systemic failures in its management of tax disputes.
"The report is based on partial information, inaccurate opinion and some misunderstanding of facts," a spokesman said.
The spokesman denied the error made in the Goldman Sachs case was evidence of a wider systemic failure and rejected the claim that the loss to the taxpayer could be as high as £20 million. "This assertion, based on untested, leaked information, is without foundation," the spokesman said.
Recent headlines appear to have shaken investor sentiment. It’s premature to read too much into a few days of weaker-than-expected survey numbers. More importantly, the latest...
The stock market sold off on a decline in February's Consumer Confidence Index (CCI), confirming a similar decline in February's Consumer Sentiment Index (CSI), which was reported...
Tariff talk and weak US data fueled a risk-off reaction Nvidia earnings may test market’s risk appetite More Fed rate cuts priced in; a “Fed put” reaction expected? Both dollar...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.