Best And Worst ETFs (And Mutual Funds): Technology Sector

Published 04/20/2012, 03:06 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

The Information Technology sector ranks 3rd out of the ten sectors as detailed in my sector roadmap. It gets my Neutral rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of 28 ETFs and 151 mutual funds in the Information Technology sector as of April 16th, 2012.
 
Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst rated ETFs and mutual funds in the sector. The best ETFs and mutual funds allocate more value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks than the worst ETFs and mutual funds, which allocate too much value to Neutral-or-worse-rated stocks.
 
To identify the best and avoid the worst ETFs and mutual funds within the Information Technology sector, investors need a predictive rating based on (1) stocks ratings of the holdings and (2) the all-in expenses of each ETF and mutual fund. Investors need not rely on backward-looking ratings.
 
Investors seeking exposure to the Information Technology sector should buy one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from Figures 1 and 2.  
 
Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5
Tech Figure 1
Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNA’s less than 100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5
Tech Figure 2
Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNA’s less than 100 million for inadequate liquidity.
 
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings
 
The following mutual funds are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity standards: PGTYX, PGTRX, PGTDX, ICTFX, ICTEX.  

  • Technology Select Sector SPDR (XLK) is my top-rated Information Technology ETF and Vanguard World Funds: Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund (VITAX) is my top-rated Information Technology mutual fund. Both earn my Attractive rating.

International Business Machines Corp (IBM) is one of my favorite stocks held by Information Technology ETFs and mutual funds and earns my Very Attractive rating. Synthesizing the mass of data and information floating around in cyberspace is a big job, and IBM has proven to be a leader in the field. Not only is the company incredibly efficient, earning a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 15%, but the expectations embedded in the stock price are unduly low. IBM’s current stock price of $202.80 implies the company will grow its NOPAT by only 7% over its remaining life. Strong returns on invested capital and a cheap valuation are why I like this stock.
 
PowerShares Lux Nanotech Portfolio (PXN) is my worst-rated Information Technology ETF and IVY Funds: Ivy Science & Technology Fund (ISTEX)] is my worst-rated Information Technology mutual fund. Both earn my Dangerous rating.
 
Aspen Technology, Inc (AZPN) is one of my least favorite stocks held by Information Technology ETFs and mutual funds and earns my Dangerous rating. Aspen’s management has a proven track record of poor capital allocation.

The company’s dismal -6% return on invested capital (ROIC) places the company in the bottom 10th percentile of all Russell 3000 companies. Only twice during the 14 years I’ve covered the company has it generated a ROIC over its weighted average cost of capital (WACC). During that time, the company has written off 28 cents for every dollar of shareholders’ equity. And yet the stock’s valuation forecasts the company will succeed in a phenomenal turnaround. Specifically, the current stock price (~$19.57) implies in the company will grow revenues at over 20% compounded annually for 11 years while also improving its ROIC from -5.7% in 2011 to over 20%. Good luck with that.

Figure 3 shows that 169 out of the 631 stocks (over 55% of the total net assets) held by Information Technology ETFs and mutual funds get an Attractive-or-better rating. However, only 8 out of 28 Information Technology ETFs (less than 82% of total net assets) and 7 out of 151 Information Technology mutual funds (1% of total net assets) get an Attractive-or-better rating.
 
The takeaways are: mutual fund managers allocate too much capital to low-quality stocks and investors in Information Technology ETFs do a great job at identifying ETFs with great portfolio management and low costs as 82% of the Value of ETFs are allocated to Attractive-rated ETFs.
 
Figure 3: Information Technology Sector Landscape For ETFs, Mutual Funds & Stocks
Tech Figure 3
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings
 
Investors need to tread carefully when considering Information Technology ETFs and mutual funds, as only 15 are worth buying. Only 8 Information Technology ETFs and 7 Information Technology mutual funds allocate enough value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks to earn an Attractive rating. Figures 4 and 5 show the rating landscape of all Information Technology ETFs and mutual funds.
 
549 stocks of the 3000+ I cover are classified as Information Technology stocks, but due to style drift, Information Technology ETFs and mutual funds hold 631 stocks. 
 
Figures 4 and 5 show the rating landscape of all Information Technology ETFs and mutual funds.
 
Our sector roadmap report ranks all sectors and highlights those that offer the best investments.
 
Figure 4: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst ETFs
Tech Figure 4
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Figure 5: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Mutual Funds

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Disclosure: I receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme.


Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.