Best & Worst ETFs & Mutual Funds: Industrials Sector

Published 04/20/2012, 03:14 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM

The Industrials sector ranks fourth out of the ten sectors as detailed in my sector roadmap. It gets my Neutral rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of 16 ETFs and 18 mutual funds in the Industrials  sector as of April 16, 2012.

Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst-rated ETFs and mutual funds in the sector. The best ETFs and mutual funds allocate more value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks than the worst, which allocate too much value to Neutral-or-worse-rated stocks.

To identify the best and avoid the worst ETFs and mutual funds within the Industrials sector, investors need a predictive rating based on (1) stocks ratings of the holdings and (2) the all-in expenses of each ETF and mutual fund. Investors need not rely on backward-looking ratings.

There are no Attractive-or-better-rated ETFs or mutual funds in this sector. Investors seeking exposure to Industrials stocks should buy a basket of Attractive-or-better-rated stocks and avoid paying undeserved ETF or fund fees. Active management has a long history of not paying off.

Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5
Industrial Fig 1
Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNA’s less than 100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5
Industrial Fig 2
Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNA’s less than 100 million for inadequate liquidity.

Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Industrial Select Sector SPDR (XL) is my top-rated Industrials ETF and Fidelity Select Portfolios: Defense & Aerospace Portfolio (FSDAX) is my top-rated Industrials mutual fund. Both earn my Neutral rating.

Market Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) is my worst-rated Industrials ETF and Guggenheim Investments Transportation Fund (RYTSX) is my worst-rated Industrials mutual fund. EVX earns my Dangerous rating and RYTSX earns my Very Dangerous rating.

Figure 3 shows that 101 out of the 516 stocks (over 36% of the total net assets) held by Industrials ETFs and mutual funds get an Attractive-or-better rating. However, none of the 16 Industrials ETFs and none of the 18 Industrials mutual funds earn an Attractive-or-better rating.

Mutual fund managers allocate too much capital to low-quality stocks and Industrials ETFs hold poor quality stocks.

Figure 3: Industrials Sector Landscape For ETFs, Mutual Funds & Stocks

Industrial Fig 3
Sources:   New Constructs, LLC and company filings
 
Investors need to tread carefully when considering Industrials ETFs and mutual funds, as none are worth buying. Investors seeking exposure to Industrials stocks should buy a basket of Attractive-or-better-rated stocks and avoid paying undeserved fund fees.
 
General Dynamics Corp (GD) is one of my favorite stocks held by XLI and FSDAX and earns my Attractive rating. GD has a strong business model, with an ROIC above 9% for the last 5 years, a feat matched by less than 14% of Russell 3000 companies. GD’s current valuation, at $68.88/share, implies a permanent 20% decline in profits. GD’s consistent history of profits and low expectations for future profitability offer investors appealing risk/reward.
 
Honeywell International, Inc. (HON) is one of my least favorite stocks held by Industrials ETFs and mutual funds and earns my Dangerous rating. HON is a value destroyer with negative economic earnings in 13 of the last 15 years. To justify its current stock price of $58.07, HON needs to grow profits by 7.4% annually for 20 years. Hard to imagine the company meeting those expectations given its lack of profitability to date.
 
Figures 4 and 5 show the rating landscape of all Industrials ETFs and mutual funds.
 
431 stocks of the 3000+ I cover are classified as Industrials stocks, but due to style drift, Industrials ETFs and mutual funds hold 516 stocks.
 
Figures 4 and 5 show the rating landscape of all Industrials ETFs and mutual funds.
 
Our sector roadmap report ranks all sectors and highlights those that offer the best investments.
 
Figure 4: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst ETFs
Industrial Fig 4
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Figure 5: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Mutual Funds
Industrial Fig 5
Sources:   New Constructs, LLC and company filings

Disclosure: I receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector or theme.

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.