🤯 Have you seen our AI stock pickers’ 2024 results? 84.62%! Grab November’s list now.Pick Stocks with AI

Automotive MMI: Big Three Companies Post Sales Increases In June

Published 07/05/2018, 03:44 AM
Updated 07/09/2023, 06:31 AM
GM
-
F
-
STLAM
-
HG
-
PA
-
PL
-
MLD
-
SSCc1
-

The Automotive Monthly Metals Index (MMI) fell one point this month for a July reading of 103.


Automotive MMI

U.S. Auto Sales

Nonetheless, June was a good month for the top U.S. automakers.

General Motors (NYSE:GM), which this year announced it would only report sales on a quarterly basis moving forward, reported its Q2 sales were up 5% year over year. Chevrolet and GMC sales were up 6% and 7%, respectively, while Cadillac sales were up 3% year over year.

“Customers are buying with confidence because the economy is strong and they expect it to remain strong,” said Kurt McNeil, U.S. vice president of sales operations. “GM is in a fantastic position with so many new crossovers at all four of our brands, the industry’s only three-truck pickup strategy and clear leadership in large SUVs.”

Ford's (NYSE:F) sales were up 1.2% overall, with the breakdown of individual vehicle categories reflecting the transition away from traditional cars. Ford’s sales of trucks and SUVs were up 3.2% and 8.9%, respectively, while car sales were down 14% year over year.Through the first six months of the year, however, Ford’s sales are down 1.8% compared with the first six months of 2017.

Fiat Chrysler (NYSE:FCAU) boasted an 8% year-over-year increase in June sales, marking its best June for retail sales since 2004. The automaker’s Jeep and Ram Truck brands led the way, with sales increases of 19% and 6%, respectively.

Section 232 Auto Probe

As readers might recall, the U.S. Department of Commerce once again invoked Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, this time to investigate imports of automobile and automotive parts. The DOC launched the investigation in late May.

During a Senate Finance Committee hearing June 20, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross could not offer much in the way of specifics related to the investigation, claiming it was still too early in the process to make statements about what could happen vis-a-vis tariffs.

Hearings on the Section 232 probe are scheduled for later this month. As part of the process, interested parties could submit public comments for consideration; more than 2,300 comments were submitted.

Unsurprisingly, GM and other automakers submitted comments asking the administration to decide against imposing tariffs.

“If import tariffs on automobiles are not tailored to specifically advance the objectives of the economic and national security goals of the United States, increased import tariffs could lead to a smaller GM, a reduced presence at home and abroad for this iconic American company, and risk less—not more—U.S. jobs,” GM’s comment reads. “The threat of steep tariffs on vehicle and auto component imports risks undermining GM’s competitiveness against foreign auto producers by erecting broad brush trade barriers that increase our global costs, remove a key means of competing with manufacturers in lower-wage countries, and promote a trade environment in which we could be retaliated against in other markets.”

In response, the European Union has threatened to impose an additional $300 billion in tariffs on U.S. goods should the Trump administration elect to slap duties on auto imports, calling the potential auto tariffs a “tax on the American people,” The Guardian reported.

MetalMiner’s Stuart Burns earlier this week offered his commentary on the situation and, in his view, the negative impact tariffs would have on the market.

“Automotive manufacturers are not going to rush to build new production facilities in the U.S. in the short term, but if tariffs become a permanent feature then it’s likely to encourage the car industry to accelerate the shift towards regional production,” he wrote. “Those with scale will cope better and as such we could see further consolidation in the sector if tariffs become a permanent feature — not just in the U.S., but internationally, as trading partners retaliate against U.S. action.”

Actual Metal Prices and Trends

U.S. HDG steel dropped $1 to $1,111/st. U.S. platinum fell 5.9% to $852/ounce (its lowest level since it hit $847/ounce as of July 1, 2017). palladium bars continue to trade at a premium to platinum, but palladium also fell this month, dropping 3.5% to $948/ounce.

LME three-month copper fell 2.8% to $6,645/mt.

U.S. shredded steel scrap picked up a dollar to reach $371/st.

Chinese primary lead jumped 1.3% to $3,193.51/mt.

by Fouad Egbaria

Latest comments

Loading next article…
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.